Comparaison between the method which is used the spatial contextual information and some methods of image classification

Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 13--19 http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/mns.05.01.02

Publication Date: August 29, 2019 Submission Date: November 20, 2017 Revision Date: December 19, 2018 Accteptance Date: May 04, 2019

Download PDF

Download XML

• Export citations
  • CITATIONS & REFERENCES
  • EndNote (.ENW)
  • Mendeley, JabRef (.BIB)
  • Papers, Zotero, Reference Manager, RefWorks (.RIS)
  • ARTICLE CITATION
  • EndNote (.ENW)
  • Mendeley, JabRef (.BIB)
  • Papers, Zotero, Reference Manager, RefWorks (.RIS)
  • REFERENCES
  • EndNote (.ENW)
  • Mendeley, JabRef (.BIB)
  • Papers, Zotero, Reference Manager, RefWorks (.RIS)

• 1863 Downloads
• 3033 Views

Authors

Houda Hassouna - LARGHYDE Laboratory, University of Biskra, Biskra, Algeria.

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results obtained for the remote sensing image classification by using three methods of classification namely, Gaussian process classification method (GPC), morphological profile for classification method (MPC) and spatial contextual Gaussian process classification method (SGPC). Several classification approaches have shown that the exploitation of spatial contextual information can be attractive to increase the classification accuracy by introducing a new automated learning approach based on Gaussian process theory.

Share and Cite

Keywords

• Gaussian process
• morphological profile
• spatial contextual Gaussian process classification
• spatial contextual information

MSC

•  60G15
•  62M30

References

• [1] Y. Bazi, F. Melgani, Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images Using Gaussian Processes, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symposium, 2008 (2008), 2 pages
  • View Article
  • Google Scholar


• [2] Y. Bazi, F. Melgani, Gaussian process approach to remote sensing image classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48 (2009), 186--197
  • View Article
  • Google Scholar


• [3] H. Hassouna, F. Melgani, Comparison between spatial contextual Gaussian process classification method and other methods, The conference ADAM (Errachidia, Morroco), 2017 (2017), 12 pages
  • View Article


• [4] H. Hassouna, F. Melgani, Z. Mokhtari, Spatial Contextual Gaussian Process Learning for Remote Sensing Image Classification, Remote Sensing Lett., 6 (2015), 519--528
  • View Article
  • Google Scholar


• [5] G. Jun, J. Ghosh, Spatially Adaptive Classication of Hyperspectral Data with Gaussian Processes, in: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2 (2009), pages
  • View Article


• [6] C. E. Rasmussen, Evaluation of Gaussian Processes and Other Methods for Non-Linear Regression, Ph.D. thesis (University of Toronto), ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor (1997)
  • View Article
  • MathSciNet
  • Google Scholar


• [7] C. E. Rasmussen, Z. Ghahramani, Infinite Mixtures of Gaussian Process Experts, Proceeding NIPS'01 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic, 2001 (2001), 881--888
  • View Article
  • Google Scholar


• [8] C. E. Rasmussen, M. Kuss, Gaussian Processes in Reinforcement Learning, Proceeding NIPS'03 Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003 (2003), 751--758
  • View Article
  • Google Scholar


• [9] C. E. Rusmassen, C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Process for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
  • Google Scholar