# Method of lines and Runge-Kutta method for solving delayed one dimensional transport equation

Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 270--280
Publication Date: June 26, 2022 Submission Date: March 28, 2022 Revision Date: May 08, 2022 Accteptance Date: May 20, 2022
• 481 Views

### Authors

S. Karthick - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur-603 203, Tamilnadu, India. R. Mahendran - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur-603 203, Tamilnadu, India. V. Subburayan - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur-603 203, Tamilnadu, India.

### Abstract

In this article we consider a delayed one dimensional transport equation. The method of lines with Runge-Kutta method is applied to solve the problem. It is proved that the present method is stable and convergence of order $O(\Delta t+\bar{h}^{4})$. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the method presented in this article.

### Share and Cite

##### ISRP Style

S. Karthick, R. Mahendran, V. Subburayan, Method of lines and Runge-Kutta method for solving delayed one dimensional transport equation, Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 28 (2023), no. 3, 270--280

##### AMA Style

Karthick S., Mahendran R., Subburayan V., Method of lines and Runge-Kutta method for solving delayed one dimensional transport equation. J Math Comput SCI-JM. (2023); 28(3):270--280

##### Chicago/Turabian Style

Karthick, S., Mahendran, R., Subburayan, V.. "Method of lines and Runge-Kutta method for solving delayed one dimensional transport equation." Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 28, no. 3 (2023): 270--280

### Keywords

• Stable method
• Runge-Kutta method
• transport equation
• method of lines

•  34K10
•  35B50
•  35F10
•  65M06
•  65M12
•  65M15

### References

• [1] A. N. Al-Mutib, Stability properties of numerical methods for solving delay differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 10 (1984), 71--79

• [2] D. D. Bainov, Z. Kamont, E. Minchev, Comparison principles for impulsive hyperbolic equations of first order, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 60 (1995), 379--388

• [3] J. Banasiak, J. R. Mika, Singularly perturbed telegraph equations with applications in the random walk theory, J. Appl. Math. Stochastic Anal., 11 (1998), 9--28

• [4] A. Bellen, M. Zennaro, Numerical methods for delay differential equations, Oxford University Press, New York (2013)

• [5] Z. L. Feng, H. R. Thieme, Endemic models with arbitrarily distributed periods of infection I: fundamental properties of the model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61 (2000), 803--833

• [6] K. Gopalsamy, Stability and Oscillations in Delay Differential Equations of Population Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

• [7] E. Hairer, G. Wanner, Solving ordinary differential equations II, Springer, Berlin (1996)

• [8] H. W. Hethcote, P. van den Driessche, An SIS epidemic model with variable population size and a delay, J. Math. Biol., 34 (1995), 177--194

• [9] H. W. Hethcote, P. van den Driessche, Two SIS epidemiologic models with delays, J. Math. Biol., 40 (2000), 3--26

• [10] A. V. Holden, Models of the stochastic activity of neurons, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin (2013)

• [11] S. Karthick, V. Subburayan, Finite Difference Methods with Interpolation for First-Order Hyperbolic Delay Differential Equations, In: Differential equations and applications, 2021 (2021), 147--161

• [12] S. Karthick, V. Subburayan, R. P. Agrwal, Stable Difference Schemes with Interpolation for Delayed One-Dimensional Transport Equation, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 18 pages

• [13] Y. Kuang, Delay Differential Equations with applications in population dynamics, Academic Press, San Diego (1993)

• [14] H. P. Langtangen, S. Linge, Finite difference computing with PDEs: a modern software approach, Springer, Cham (2017)

• [15] Z. Li, Z. Qiao, T. Tang, Numerical solution of differential equations: introduction to finite difference and finite element methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

• [16] X.-D. Liu, A maximum principle satisfying modification of triangle based adapative stencils for the solution of scalar hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 30 (1993), 701--716

• [17] J. Loustau, Numerical Differential Equations, World Scientific, Hackensack (2016)

• [18] S. Mazumder, Numerical methods for partial differential equations, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam (2015)

• [19] J. J. H. Miller, E. O’riordan, G. I. Shishkin, Fitted numerical methods for singular perturbation problems, World scientific, New York (1996)

• [20] M. H. Protter, H. F. Weinberger, Maximum principles in differential equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)

• [21] P. Rai, K. K. Sharma, Numerical study of singularly perturbed differential-difference equation arising in the modeling of neuronal variability, Comput. Math. Appl., 63 (2012), 118--132

• [22] M. M. Rana, V. E. Howle, K. Long, A. Meek, A New Block Preconditioner for Implicit Runge–Kutta Methods for Parabolic PDE Problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.,, 43 (2021), 475--495

• [23] K. K. Sharma, P. Singh, Hyperbolic partial differential-difference equation in the mathematical modeling of neuronal firing and its numerical solution, Appl. Math. Comput., 201 (2008), 229--238

• [24] S. Singh, V. K. Patel, V. K. Singh, Application of wavelet collocation method for hyperbolic partial differential equations via matrices, Appl. Math. Comput., 320 (2018), 407--424

• [25] P. Singh, K. K. Sharma, Numerical solution of first-order hyperbolic partial differential-difference equation with shift, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 26 (2010), 107--116

• [26] G. D. Smith, Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, Oxford University Press, New York (1985)

• [27] H. Smith, An introduction to delay differential equations with applications to the life sciences, Springer, New York (2011)

• [28] R. B. Stein, A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability, Biophys. J., 5 (1965), 173--194

• [29] R. B. Stein, Some models of neuronal variability, Biophys. J., 7 (1967), 37--68

• [30] J. C. Strikwerda, Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations, SIAM, Philadelphia (2004)

• [31] V. Subburayan, N. Ramanujam, An asymptotic numerical method for singularly perturbed convection-diffusion problems with a negative shift, Neural Parallel Sci. Comput., 21 (2013), 431--446

• [32] V. Subburayan, N. Ramanujam, An initial value technique for singularly perturbed convection-diffusion problems with a negative shift, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 158 (2013), 234--250

• [33] E. Suli, D. F. Mayers, An introduction to numerical analysis, Cambridge university press, Cambridge (2003)

• [34] Y. Takei, Y. Iwata, Numerical Scheme Based on the Implicit Runge-Kutta Method and Spectral Method for Calculating Nonlinear Hyperbolic Evolution Equations, Axioms, 11 (2022), 19 pages

• [35] R. F. Warming, B. J. Hyett, The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite-difference methods, J. Comput. phys., 14 (1974), 159--179